Feasibility of using a dual isocentre technique for treating cervical cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac.

Objective.Patients treated for cervical cancer exhibit large inter and intra-fraction anatomical changes. The Unity MR-Linac (MRL) can image these patients with MR prior to and during treatment which enables daily plan adaptation. However, the MRL has a limited treatment field in the sup/inf direction of 22 cm which can restrict the treatment of patients who require longer treatment fields. Here we explore potential adaptive workflows in combination with a dual isocentre approach, to widen the range of cervix patients that can benefit from this treatment.Approach.Ten cervical cancer patients were retrospectively planned with a dual isocentre technique to deliver 45 Gy in 25 fractions. 5 node-negative and 5 node-positive patients were planned using the EMBRACE II protocol. A 2 cm overlap region between the two isocentres was positioned entirely in the nodal region. A treatment workflow was simulated to account for inter-fraction anatomical change. Isocentre shifts of 3 and 6 mm were applied to investigate the effect of intra-fraction motion.Main results.Dual isocentre adapted plans ensured significantly better coverage than non-adapted (recalculated) plans with a larger benefit seen for the node-negative cases. The difference to the reference plan for the V4275 cGy to the ITV was -0.8 cGy and -8.2 cGy for the adapted and recalculated plans respectively. Movements superiorly did not affect the coverage of the ITV by more than 1%, but shifting it inferiorly caused the ITV coverage on the plan to reduce by ∼2.4% per mm.Significance.A dual isocentre technique for cervical cancer treatments and adaptive workflows have been demonstrated to recover the required plan quality for inter-fraction changes. This illustrates the feasibility of a dual isocentre technique for the MRL.

Palliative radiotherapy in cancers of female genital tract: Outcomes and prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metastatic and incurable cancers of the gynaecological tract (FGTC) represent a major global health burden. Systemic treatment has modest efficacy and radiotherapy is often used for local symptoms. This study combines experience from two large UK centres in palliative radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled data from two major centres was analysed. Advanced FGTC patients who received at least one fraction of palliative radiotherapy to the pelvis between 2013 and 2018 were included. Data collected included demographic and tumour details, radiotherapy dose fractionation and details of previous and subsequent treatment. Response was defined in terms of toxicity, symptomatic response and survival. Comorbidities were recorded using a modified ACE 27 score which is adjusted for the presence of uncontrolled FGTC in all the patients. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included for treatment response and toxicity; survival data was available for 165 patients. Subjective response in pre-radiotherapy symptoms was documented in 80.4%. Grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal, urinary and other (vomiting, fatigue, pain) toxicity incidence was 2.2%, 3.8%, and 2.7% respectively. No statistically significant correlation between the prescribed EQD210 and symptom control or toxicity was seen. 1 year overall survival was 25.1% (median 5.9 months). Absent distant metastases, completion of the intended course of radiotherapy, response to radiotherapy, and receipt of further lines of treatment were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Palliative radiotherapy is effective for symptoms of advanced FGTC with low toxicity. The absence of a dose response argues for short low dose palliative radiotherapy schedules to be used.

The impact of an educational tool in cervix image registration across three imaging modalities.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate image registration is vital in cervical cancer where changes in both planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) can make decisions regarding image registration complicated. This work aims to determine the impact of a dedicated educational tool compared with experience gained in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). METHODS: 10 therapeutic radiographers acted as observers and were split into two groups based on previous experience with MRgRT and Monaco treatment planning system. Three CBCT-CT, three MR-CT and two MR-MR registrations were completed per patient by each observer. Observers recorded translations, time to complete image registration and confidence. Data were collected in two phases; prior to and following the introduction of a cervix registration guide. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted between imaging modalities. Each group was assessed independently pre- and post-education, no statistically significant differences were noted in either CBCT-CT or MR-CT imaging. Group 1 MR-MR imaging showed a statistically significant reduction in interobserver variability (p=0.04), in Group 2, the result was not statistically significant (p=0.06). Statistically significant increases in confidence were seen in all three modalities (p≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, radiographers consistently registered images across three different imaging modalities regardless of their previous experience. The implementation of an image registration guide had limited impact on inter- and intraobserver variability. Radiographers' confidence showed statistically significant improvements following the use of the registration manual. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work helps evaluate training methods for novel roles that are developing in MRgRT.

An International Expert Delphi Consensus to Develop Dedicated Geriatric Radiation Oncology Curriculum Learning Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The management of older adults with cancer is rapidly becoming a significant challenge in radiation oncology (RO) practice. The education of future radiation oncologists in geriatric oncology is fundamental to ensuring that older adults receive high-quality care. Currently RO trainees receive little training and education in geriatric oncology. The objective of this study was to define core geriatric RO curriculum learning outcomes relevant to RO trainees worldwide. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 2-stage modified Delphi consensus was conducted. Stage 1 involved the formation of an expert reference panel (ERP) of multiprofessional experts in geriatric oncology and/or RO and the compilation of a potential geriatric RO learning outcomes set. Stage 2 involved 3 iterative rounds: round 1 and round 2 (both online surveys), and an intervening ERP round. These aimed at identifying and refining ideal geriatric RO learning outcomes. Invited participants for round 1 and 2 included oncology health care professionals with expertise across RO, geriatric oncology, and/or education and consumers. Predefined Delphi consensus definitions were applied to the results of rounds 1 and 2. RESULTS: An ERP of 11 experts in geriatric oncology and/or RO was formed. Seventy potential knowledge- and skill-based learning outcomes were identified. In round 1, 103 of 179 invited eligible Delphi participants completed the survey (58% response rate). The ERP round was conducted, resulting in the exclusion of 28 learning outcomes. In round 2, 54 of 103 completed the survey (52% response rate). This identified a final total of 33 geriatric RO learning outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The geriatric RO learning outcomes described in this study form an international consensus that can inform RO training bodies worldwide. This represents the first fundamental step in developing a global educational framework aimed at improving RO trainee knowledge and skills in geriatric oncology.

International efforts in geriatric radiation oncology.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric assessment (GA) has been recommended to form part of treatment decision making for older adults with cancer. However despite consensus guidelines from various organizations, GA does not appear to be a part of routine practice in radiation oncology. The aim of the current study was to explore the implementation of GA in radiation oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This anonymous international survey investigated current use of GA in patients presenting for radiation therapy aged 65 years and over, in accordance with Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) guidelines. The survey was designed, using Qualitrics™, an online survey tool. It was distributed via SIOG, social media and radiation oncology professional organizations. Survey responses were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics. An additional analysis by creating a dichotomous variable based on awareness of major clinical practice guidelines and current use of GA. RESULTS: Among 158 respondents, there was relatively low awareness of GA guidelines and low uptake of validated tools and processes. A minority of participants, only 16%, stated that they had a specialized geriatric oncology program in their institution. Approximately a third (34%) of respondents were unaware of any GA clinical practice guidelines. With regard to what way participants assess older patients differently to younger patients, 16% reported formally using specific validated tools, whereas 73% reported an informal assessment based on their own judgment, with 5% reporting no difference between younger and older patients. Regarding the use of validated screening tools for geriatric impairments, over half reported using none (57%). Regarding GA implementation, the main barriers highlighted included a lack of clinical/support staff, a lack of training, knowledge, understanding or experience about GA and a lack of time. DISCUSSION: Relatively low awareness of guidelines and low uptake of formal GA tools and processes were found. The integration of GA principles into radiation oncology appears to be ad hoc and very much in its infancy. There is a clear need for increased interdisciplinary education and collaboration between the disciplines of radiation oncology and geriatric medicine.

The care of older cancer patients in the United Kingdom.

The ageing population poses new challenges globally. Cancer care for older patients is one of these challenges, and it has a significant impact on societies. In the United Kingdom (UK), as the number of older cancer patients increases, the management of this group has become part of daily practice for most oncology teams in every geographical area. Older cancer patients are at a higher risk of both under- and over-treatment. Therefore, the assessment of a patient's biological age and effective organ functional reserve becomes paramount. This may then guide treatment decisions by better estimating a prognosis and the risk-to-benefit ratio of a given therapy to anticipate and mitigate against potential toxicities/difficulties. Moreover, older cancer patients are often affected by geriatric syndromes and other issues that impact their overall health, function and quality of life. Comprehensive geriatric assessments offer an opportunity to identify and address health problems which may then optimise one's fitness and well-being. Whilst it is widely accepted that older cancer patients may benefit from such an approach, resources are often scarce, and access to dedicated services and research remains limited to specific centres across the UK. The aim of this project is to map the current services and projects in the UK to learn from each other and shape the future direction of care of older patients with cancer.

Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the consistency of therapy radiographers performing image registration using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-CT, magnetic resonance (MR)-CT, and MR-MR image guidance for cervix cancer radiotherapy and to assess that MR-based image guidance is not inferior to CBCT standard practice. METHODS: 10 patients receiving cervix radiation therapy underwent daily CBCT guidance and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging weekly during treatment. Offline registration of each MR image, and corresponding CBCT, to planning CT was performed by five radiographers. MR images were also registered to the earliest MR interobserver variation was assessed using modified Bland-Altman analysis with clinically acceptable 95% limits of agreement (LoA) defined as ±5.0 mm. RESULTS: 30 CBCT-CT, 30 MR-CT and 20 MR-MR registrations were performed by each observer. Registration variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were minor and both strategies resulted in 95% LoA over the clinical threshold in the anteroposterior direction (CBCT-CT ±5.8 mm, MR-CT ±5.4 mm). MR-MR registrations achieved a significantly improved 95% LoA in the anteroposterior direction (±4.3 mm). All strategies demonstrated similar results in lateral and longitudinal directions. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of interobserver variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were similar, confirming that MR-CT radiotherapy workflows are comparable to CBCT-CT image-guided radiotherapy. Our results suggest MR-MR radiotherapy workflows may be a superior registration strategy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first publication quantifying interobserver registration of multimodality image registration strategies for cervix radical radiotherapy patients.

New horizons in radiotherapy for older people.

Radiotherapy is an effective, albeit underutilised, treatment for cancer in older adults, especially for those who are surgically inoperable or for whom chemotherapy poses too great a risk. It is estimated that approximately half of patients with cancer could benefit from radiotherapeutic management. This article synthesises the basics of how radiotherapy works, recent developments in the field and considers how this treatment modality may be adapted in an older patient population or may evolve in the future. Technological advances of relevance include Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc therapy (VMAT), Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR), proton therapy, MR guided radiotherapy, as well as better image guidance during irradiation in order to improve precision and accuracy. New approaches for better integration of geriatric medicine principles into the oncologic assessment and workup will also be considered, in order to provide more age attuned care. For more informed decision making, a baseline assessment of older radiotherapy patients should encompass some form of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. This can facilitate the optimal radiotherapy regime to be selected, to avoid overly toxic regimes in patients with frailty. The review discusses how these new initiatives and technologies have potential for effective oncologic management and can help to reduce the toxicity of treatment for older adults. It concludes by highlighting the need for more evidence in this patient population including better patient selection and support for treatment to enhance person-centred care.

Geriatric oncology: assessing the needs of older people with cancer.

A majority of cancer cases now occur among older people, but this group is less likely to receive treatment and outcomes are poorer than in younger people. Age by itself can be a poor predictor of who will benefit from treatment with surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a multidisciplinary, multidomain process that helps to identify frailty, which is associated with increased mortality. Comprehensive geriatric assessment highlights areas that should be optimized before treatment and helps support a shared decision-making approach. Geriatricians, oncologists and surgeons now work together to help assess and support older people with cancer.